Red flags on alternative therapy websites. (Health Scout News) March 21, 2003 -- Researchers from the University of California in San Diego reviewed web sites with information about three complementary/alternative treatments for cancer. The sites included information about floressence (Essiac), the herbal product amalaki, and selenium.
They were looking for four red flags that they identified as indicators that the site's scientific accuracy was questionable.
The treatments are for sale online.
The site includes patient testimonials.
The treatment is promoted as a cancer cure.
The treatment claims to have no side effects.
They found that more than 90% of the sites with information about floressence and amalaki raised at least one red flag. Only 23% of the the selenium sites did so, and even those with red flags offered at least some accurate information about selenium and cancer treatment.
Information on the floressence and amalki sites was vague, inaccurate, and anecdotal according to the researchers.
Read the news report on Yahoo! News.